BACK NEXT
Mass Media

Gramsci's hegemony theory and the ideological role of the mass media

by Stuart Hainsworth

The media as hegemonic tool - for and against

Media support of dominant ideologies

“The truth, because it can be spread, must be adapted to the historical and cultural conditions of the social group in which we want it to be spread.” (Jenks (1995) : 81) Due to the constraints of modern life and the intellectual and moral difficulties it brings, media has a crucial role in forming the basis for any communication between any group or groups of peoples. The imposition of ‘natural’ and ‘common sense’ traits has become very valuable in the study of how society can be influenced by gathering social trends and bearing. Views could be explained to be seen as individual and special to any particular person. However, the theory that many people may have the same views as one another, may lead to the assumption that media has an effect in placing and changing views on a large scale basis.  Hegemony is used by Western culturalists to try and explain the backing of widespread opinionated themes which run through society. Examples of this may be found in the treatment of gay people, feminists and minorities within the media. This argument tends to be supported by the seemingly matching media coverage of the values. In one sense the media could be seen as offering an opportunity for consumers to view the text and make their own minds up about any particular subject.  However, the value given to the modern day media is in direct contrast to that view. Pressures on people put there by advertisements, campaigns and coercion against social minority groups to conform to a particular body or ideology could be said to be huge. Racism is a large problem in modern Western culture and this question, it could be argued, is made more problematic by the media attention any story or campaign may achieve. The  increasing value placed upon media by politicians and the demand of public to be told their news quickly and sharply leads to the conclusion that media and the ideology it creates is directly answerable to the theory of hegemony.

The media as 'fourth estate'?

Media has the power to move through social barriers and win and lose the consent explained in theory of hegemony. It is this idea which places many democratic governments at the will of the organised media. Consent gained and lost by the media can be directly translated to the success and failure of political parties, policies and leadership. An example of the power of the press and media can be drawn in the battle for consent in respect of the Poll Tax which was introduced by a politically lagging Margaret Thatcher. The media instantly latched upon the idea and managed to create and fuel an atmosphere of both hatred and passion towards the new policy and in turn, the government. The pressure led to demonstration, rioting and general revolt against the idea. It could be argued that theory of hegemony was tested by this fact. However, media coverage of the whole story may have given rise to the eventual removal of the policy, therefore the theory could be said to have linked in with the coverage and ideological role of the media. Many people have moved to a situation whereby they receieve their political information from soundbites and tiny snippets of media. It is here where the battle lines are drawn when it comes to the winning of consent. The turning of The Sun to support Labour in 1997 was considered by many to be the turning point. The headline “It was The Sun what won it.” (The Sun, 2 May 1997, p. 1.) is an example of how the media saw the whole of the 1997 campaign. If the people at the centre of creating the ideology to be consumed by the public see the importance of the winning of consent through media, then the theory could be argued to exist.  However, the media are as powerful as the public permits it to be. A monster created by the people for the people; the media are responsible for the deliverance of messages is the area of discussion for political ideology. People who are dragged into the realm of believing and above all, trusting the media are the ones at risk of being dominated and instilled with the values of others. The current ‘debates’ within the media on topics such as whether Britain should join the Euro and the growing of genetically modified food are examples of the way in which media can influence the debate. The phrase ‘Frankenstein food’ is regularly used to describe the crops that no official report has conclusively proved any cast iron facts.

BACK NEXT