|
|||
|
|
Peter Golding reports how he became interested in the mid-1970s in the fact that genuine poverty still existed in the welfare state and how the press reported it.
Gradually through this period the story we are told shifts from the problems of poverty to the crimes of the poor.
Golding (1994)
The themes which became prominent in the press at the time were:
Golding reports how the scroungerphobia began to subside in the recession of the early 80s, but
the ideology that had permitted and endorsed a major shift in the administration of social security from the promotion of benefits to people who needed them but don't claim, to the policing of the few whose claims were dubious, was never allowed to subside.
The campaign is still with us today despite the countless millions on the dole:
Golding concludes:
Wherever we look, in coverage of race, industrial relations, welfare, foreign relations, or electoral politics, the media have failed democracy. We live in a political society in blinkers.
It is not at all clear by what mechanism the public may be influenced by the media to develop prejudices against certain social groups, but an interesting suggestion is made by Jonas et al (1995) in their discussion of experiments conducted by Staats and Staats (1958). Words were presented auditorially to subjects immediately after the visual presentation of a name of a nationality. The words presented auditorially had either positive or negative connotations (e.g. vacation, gift, bitter, failure). Dutch was systematically paired with positive words, Swedish with negative ones. When tested afterwards, subjects rated Dutch more positively than Swedish. Jonas et al suggest that the systematic pairing of certain social groups with negative information in the media may have an effect via a similar method of classical conditioning.
|